Australia's 2027 gambling ad ban sets no follower cutoff

January 1, 2027 is the start date, and reports of the guidance published on October 19, 2026 set no minimum follower count for who is caught. From that date, gambling advertising in Australia must not feature a notable person, whether it is broadcast or provided online.

Licensed interactive wagering service providers may not, from that day, contract for a notable person to promote wagering advertising in Australia. The duty sits on the operator, not the person in the ad, under the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) rules these outlets quote. iGB put the preparation window at less than three months.

No minimum follower count

Focus Gaming News reported no follower minimum and no verification requirement. A social media account does not, on its own, make someone an influencer. A creator with a small audience can still be caught if recognised and influential in one community.

Public profile, media exposure, professional achievements, influence on decisions, compensation, and a tie between the ad and the person's identity all count.

That definition is deliberately broad, not limited to people who appeal to children. It also weighs influence on people at risk of gambling harm, including younger men. A follower floor would have been easier to police. Those reports do not offer one.

Who the notable-person definition still includes

iGB, GamblingNews and InterGame described the same group on October 19: a current or former professional sports player or athlete, celebrity, social media influencer or prominent individual, plus any class the Minister determines. Retirement does not, Focus reported, take out someone who is still recognised or still able to influence an audience.

Television, radio, news websites, online games and social media are all in scope, iGB and Xinhua reported. iGB, citing ASGAM, called the guidance 11 pages long.

Question	What the reports attribute to the rules	Where it was reported
Who is in scope	A current or former professional sports player or athlete, celebrity, social media influencer or prominent individual, plus any class the Minister determines	iGB, GamblingNews, InterGame
Who the duty sits on	The licensed interactive wagering service provider, not the notable person	Focus Gaming News, iGB
Start date	January 1, 2027, for the ban on featuring a notable person and for the contract restriction	iGB, Xinhua

Source: iGB, Focus Gaming News, Xinhua, GamblingNews and InterGame, on ACMA guidance published October 19, 2026.

Why the duty sits on the licensed operator

Focus said breaches sit with the licensed operator, including where an agency makes the ad, and it cited section 62W. Providers must not enter contracts or arrangements for a notable person to promote wagering advertising in Australia, and must not authorise or cause that advertising to be broadcast or put online.

Status can change after signature. If someone becomes notable later, failing to take all reasonably available steps to withdraw the ad can itself be a breach. No grace period is stated.

When a racing ad can still show a notable person

Focus reported a narrow exception. The ad must relate solely or principally to racing, and it must run on a dedicated racing programme or channel, or through a dedicated racing online content service. Both conditions are required. Heavy coverage of other sports will usually fall outside it.

iGB said the guidance gives examples of who falls outside the definition, and that the ACMA may publish formal guidance later. Xinhua called the document preparation help, including on exemptions.

What else in the statute starts on January 1

The Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026 passed Parliament on August 19, 2026, iGB reported. Focus described the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Act 2026, enacted on August 26, 2026, as the text that amended the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. Passage and enactment are different steps, and this piece does not merge the dates.

This site's July 3, 2026 report covered the bill as it faced a Senate inquiry. The October guidance is the later document. At an August 4, 2026 hearing, iGB reported, Senator Sarah Hanson-Young pressed the ACMA, and Sportsbet warned the draft could catch "anyone with an Instagram account". Sportsbet, TAB and Responsible Wagering Australia backed the package, but warned a total ban would push customers to illegal offshore operators. The guidance left the definition broad.

From January 1, iGB also reported limits on wagering ads in live sport and sports venues, a ban on marketing inducements directly to at-risk customers, tougher action on illegal services and BetStop, the national self-exclusion register, and rules on harmful online lottery products. Two levy bills passed the same day, the National Self-Exclusion Register (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026 and the Interactive Gambling (Cost Recovery Levy) Bill 2026. A June 29, 2026 report on this site covered 12 further ACMA blocks on illegal gambling sites.

If influence inside one community is enough, and status can change after the contract is signed, which withdrawal counts as all the steps that were reasonably available?

This article is informational analysis only and is not gambling or financial advice. Figures are as attributed in the text.

18+Gambling carries financial risk and can be addictive. If you or someone you know needs help, visit GamCare (UK), call 1-800-GAMBLER (US), or see our Responsible Gambling page.